Why Photography?

What’s the point of taking pictures? I’ve been to a number of photography exhibits here in Texas this summer. Almost inevitably I leave wondering, “Why?” What’s the point of this? I don’t mean the question about why art, but rather “Why photography?” How does this medium help to communicate the artist’s particular message? The larger question, of course, is to ask what photography is especially well-suited to contribute as a medium?

The answer which obviously jumps to mind is through documentary work. Photographers can capture events “as they happen.” But beyond that, why do we see photography in art museums as fine art? Honestly, I don’t think I’ve seen anything this summer that couldn’t have been just as effective if it were a painting. Susan Sontag claims that one of the most important aspects of all photography, as art or otherwise, is the element of time. Photography appropriates time. It captures it, controls it, and frames it. Consequently, it gives power to the person doing the photographing. It is this element which lends the authority necessary for documentary work. So how does this affect me? What are the ethical consequences appropriating a piece of history, a piece of someone’s life? How do I make sure that I’m being fair to the people I’m photographing? I think the answer lies in the relative vulnerability. I need to figure out a way to make sure that I am as vulnerable in the photographic process as my subjects are, regardless of who they are. I’m not sure yet how to do this, but I feel strongly that it’s the key to the process.

Ultimately, I think that’s the important thing that photography has to offer to the art world. Photography is unique in that it communicates something about both subject and author. It communicates relationships in a way that other mediums cannot.